Israel is sworn enemy of Latin America’s progressive women presidents

(WMR)—Through its actions in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, the so-called “ABC” countries all currently governed by progressive women presidents, Israel has identified itself as an enemy of not only progressive governments in Latin America but particularly those with female leaders.

Israeli and Zionist agents-of-influence, including international hedge fund mogul George Soros, were working overtime in aiding Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff’s conservative presidential challenger Aecio Neves.

Neves’s economics adviser is Arminio Fraga Neto, a former Soros Quantum Fund executive who would become Finance Minister lording over the privatization of Brazilian state assets to Soros and other interests under a Neves presidency. Neves’s foreign policy adviser is Rubens Antônio Barbosa, a die-hard neo-conservative with strong ties to the Council on Foreign Relations, who would withdraw Brazil from the BRICS economic alliance of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, as a way to advance the interests of the global central bankers of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, both based in Washington and both controlled by Zionist financial circles.

Israel has used other agents-of-influence, namely U.S. diplomats posted to the U.S. embassy in Brasilia and the U.S. Consulate General in Rio de Janeiro, to quietly assist the Neves campaign with political advice and cash laundered through the National Endowment for Democracy. Despite their efforts, Rousseff won Sunday’s runoff election to win a second term.

Argentina’s President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner witnessed her September 24 speech to the UN General Assembly interrupted by what UN officials called “technical difficulties.” In fact, Kirchner’s speech was censored by the UN amid catcalls from the Israeli delegation and New York Zionist Jews specifically placed by the Israelis in the public gallery to boo those world leaders who criticized the Jewish state’s policies.

Kirchner has been subjected to a vicious Zionist campaign launched against its financial system by the Elliott Management Fund, the “vulture” hedge fund owned by New York Zionist and neo-conservative Republican Paul Singer. In 2002, after Argentina defaulted on its debt, Singer’s Cayman Islands-based NML Capital Limited bought the devalued Argentina bonds knowing full well he would be lucky to get 30 cents on the dollar. However, Singer began a shake down of Argentina to squeeze more money out of its financially-troubled economy. NML convinced Ghana to seize the Argentine naval training ship Libertad in 2012. Mark Brodsky, Singer’s former Elliott Management Fund executive and now head of Aurelius Capital Management, joined in the extortion of Argentina in demanding that a portion of the $1.2 billion debt be paid not only to Singer but also to his fund.

The Israeli media avoids the use of “vulture” funds to describe contrivances like those of Singer and Brodsky. It prefers to use “hold-out funds,” which places the onus on the debtors and not the unscrupulous collectors.

A Singer-owned U.S. federal judge in New York, Thomas Griesa, ordered Argentina to pay all the money Singer was demanding instead of a reduced amount. Griesa is 85 years old and is known for taking naps on the bench while hearing cases.

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court, on which three American Jews (Ruth Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan) sit and who did not recuse themselves from the case, decided to reject Argentina’s appeal of Griesa’s ruling.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on the Argentina case was purely political. Argentina had determined, contrary to Zionist and neocon myth, that Iran was not responsible for the 1994 bombing of the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association (AMIA) building in Buenos Aires, which killed 84 people. Kirchner and other Argentine investigators later discovered that the bombing was an Israeli-inspired false flag operation intended to embarrass Argentina’s President Carlos Saul Menem, who was the son of Syrian immigrants to Argentina.

Israel was upset with Menem because he strengthened Argentina’s ties to Iran. Menem was forced to abandon an Argentine nuclear cooperation deal with Iran following the 1994 bombing of the AMIA.

The U.S. ambassador to Argentina at the time of the bombing James Cheek, told The Nation magazine, “To my knowledge, there was never any real evidence [that Iran was responsible]. They never came up with anything.” The only evidence of any links between the bombing and any Iranians is the fact that “evidence” of the Iranian government’s alleged involvement was manufactured by the anti-Tehran Iranian terrorist group Mojaheddin-e-Khalq (MEK), which receives funding and other support from Mossad and the CIA.

After the bombing of the AMIA, Mossad planted evidence at the scene. Two years earlier, after a bomb at the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires killed 22 people, Mossad also planted evidence suggesting Iran was behind the attack.

Realizing that Menem had been subjected to a vicious character assassination campaign by the Zionist media, Kirchner set about to inform the General Assembly of Israel’s culpability in false flag attacks. Perhaps no better setting than the UN could have been used by Kirchner less than a two weeks after the commemoration of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, which amounted to yet another false flag operation that bore all the trademark Mossad handiwork.

There is little doubt that Singer, aided and abetted by judges Griesa, Ginsberg, Breyer, and Kagan, took his revenge out on Argentina on behalf of their Israeli masters. Kirchner’s determination that the two bombings in Buenos Aires were carried out by Israel and its MEK allies as a way to harm Menem was too much truth for the Israelis and their American influence peddlers.

Kirchner told the General Assembly, “Our investigation’s results indicate that Iran wasn’t behind Argentina’s terrorist attacks.” She also questioned what countries were actually behind the rise of the Islamic State in the Middle East. She pointedly said to the U.S. delegation, “Today you pretend making a coalition against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), but in fact you’re their allies.”

As for Hezbollah, Kirchner stated, “Hezbollah of Lebanon is a recognized great organization in Lebanon, not a terrorist group.” These comments increased the din from the Zionist “peanut gallery” and resulted in Kirchner’s microphone cutting out and an interruption of the feed from UN interpreters translating her speech from Spanish to English, Russian, Chinese, French, and Arabic.

To Singer and his friends in the Israeli delegation and in the public gallery, Kirchner had a simple message: “In times of economic vultures and war falcons, we need more doves of peace.” The Israelis; Singer; Julio Schlosser, president of DAIA, Argentina’s version of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC); and their media shills were outraged.

Amercia’s perennial Jewish “whiner,” Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), has taken it upon himself to attack Chilean Socialist President Michelle Bachelet for perceived slights against the Jewish state by Chile. In an August 5, 2014, letter to Bachelet, Foxman complained, “We are deeply troubled by the actions and decisions of your government, in coordination with others in the region, issuing harsh one-sided statements toward Israel and recalling Chile’s Ambassador in Tel Aviv for consultation . . . we urge you to return your Ambassador to Israel.”

Bachelet has irritated the Zionists by making common cause with Chile’s large and mostly Christian Palestinian diaspora community. She has likened her refugee status in Europe during the Israeli-supported dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet to the plight of Palestinians who had to flee their homeland amid Israeli rule. That has torqued the jaws of Zionists and neocons from New York to Tel Aviv.

Previously published in the Wayne Madsen Report.

Copyright © 2014 WayneMadenReport.com

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report (subscription required).

Comments are closed.