A 9/11 syllogism

No steel-framed skyscraper can defy the laws of science and of basic physics and collapse symmetrically at free-fall speed into its own footprint as a result of fire.

The World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper, which was not hit by an airplane and suffered only a few scattered fires, collapsed symmetrically into its own footprint at 5:21 PM on September 11, 2001.

Therefore, Building 7 did not fall as a result of fires, as the United States government claims. The only way a building could so collapse is through controlled demolition.

Edward Curtin is a sociologist and writer who teaches at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts and has published widely.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Responses to A 9/11 syllogism

  1. Exactly so, Mr. Curtin, WTC #7 is the in-your-face smoking gun of 9/11. An apparent foul-up in the planned attack, it should have exposed the entire disaster for the self-inflicted treachery that it was. It is possible that “flight 93″ was supposed to have impacted WTC #7 (WTC #1 and #2 had to collapse first before an airplane could fly into #7) but it was shot down over Pennsylvania by a mid-western Air National Guard fighter that had wandered onto the scene. “Should have exposed”, indeed, for it seems that no matter how damning the evidence that leaks out over time, like no identifiable wreckage, luggage or bodies at two of the crash sites, nothing will wake our fellow citizens to the inconvenient truth that a truly evil force is running amok in our land.

  2. John Roberts of UK

    Another official investigation is needed determine the truth of what happened because it is clear that the US government’s original investigation was seriously flawed and its conclusions incorrect.