Clinton drops baggage; conservatives looking for another scandal

Three weeks before the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Hillary Rodham Clinton unloaded heavy baggage.

In an extremely rare news conference, FBI director James Comey summarized the conclusions of a seven month FBI investigation into Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail rather than more secure governmental servers during her four years as secretary of state.

Clinton’s role in the attack upon the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left four dead in September 2012, had been a major campaign issue. Conservatives and 16 major Republican candidates for the Republican nomination for president had used what they said was her slow defense of the consulate to attack her. However, several investigations by congressional committees, chaired by Republicans, found no culpability on Clinton’s part. The cost is about $7 million.

Unable to gain significant traction, the conservatives looked for another possible scandal, and found it with her use of personal e-mail to conduct government business. For more than a year, they have hammered on this scandal. Their hope had been to pull votes from Clinton to Bernie Sanders, believing that Sanders, if nominated, was the weaker opposition to the final few Republican candidates. What has resulted is a debt incurred by taxpayers that is at least $20 million for the investigation, according to the Fiscal Times.

Clinton hurt her campaign by delayed response to the allegations she compromised national security and then by dodging and weaving on her public comments, allowing the scandal to fester and explode. The conservatives got additional ammunition when a meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch fell into their laps. Both claim the meeting in Phoenix was accidental, and the main topic was grandchildren. The conservatives pounced on that; even liberals, moderates, and independents thought it was inappropriate for the attorney general who might become the prosecutor to be chatting with the husband of the presumptive nominee for president who was the target of a federal investigation. Both Lynch and the 42nd president, who met on the attorney general’s government aircraft, later acknowledged they should not have met, even if the only conversation was social.

In front of news cameras and the press, Comey revealed that from more than 30,000 emails the FBI read, sorted, and analyzed, “110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.” Eight chains, said Comey, contained top secret information; 36 contained secret information; and eight contain confidential information. About 2,000 e-mails were later “up-classified.” The FBI also interrogated numerous individuals who had knowledge of, and access to, the e-mails. There was no hacking of Clinton’s server, no leaks of e-mail content, and no evidence of any deletion of the e-mails by Clinton or anyone else, said Comey. Based upon federal laws, the FBI determined, “our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case [into court].” This past week, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that the Department of Justice would not pursue felony charges against Clinton.

However, Clinton didn’t skate free. Comey pointed out that Clinton and the Department of State were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” that “there is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation,” and that “none of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan said the FBI recommendation not to prosecute Clinton “defies explanation.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) questioned Comey’s integrity, although Cruz had voted to confirm him in 2013 to be FBI director. Comey, a Republican, was first appointed U.S. Attorney and then deputy attorney general during the Bush–Cheney administration.

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee who had spent much of the primaries calling Ted Cruz a liar, after Cruz dropped out of the race now threw venom on Clinton, innumerous times calling her a liar and a crook. Following the press conference, Trump said “the system is rigged . . . very unfair! As usual, bad judgment.” He then launched an attack upon Lynch, stating, without evidence, “It’s a bribe . . . The attorney general is sitting there saying, ‘If I get Hillary off the hook, I’m going to have four more years or eight more years. But if she loses, I’m out of a job.’ It’s a bribe. It’s a disgrace.” Trump also bellowed, continuing his campaign of shoving misinformation in front of the voters, that President Obama was part of a conspiracy to drop charges against Clinton.

The FBI’s recommendation, said Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus, was “a glaring indictment of Hillary Clinton’s complete lack of judgment, honesty, and preparedness to be our next commander-in-chief, and they confirm what we’ve long known: Hillary Clinton has spent the last 16 months looking into cameras deliberately lying to the American people.”

The conservatives, especially Trump, will continue to push Benghazi and e-mails, no matter what the evidence shows, and will be looking for anything they can find that may lead to another scandal—and several million dollars to investigate it.

As far as Clinton is concerned, there have been many lessons from the Benghazi and e-mail scandals, but the major one is that a candidate can’t allow the opposition to control the message, but must be open and, if wrong, apologize and correct a problem before it explodes.

Dr. Brasch, an award-winning journalist, has covered government/politics for more than four decades. His latest book is “Fracking America: Sacrificing Health and the Environment for Short-Term Economic Benefit.”

2 Responses to Clinton drops baggage; conservatives looking for another scandal

  1. Notwithstanding Comey’s saying that his family and his INTEGRITY are the two things he cares most about in his life (and many democrats praising him for his integrity for not indicting/prosecuting Hillary Clinton), I found his statement on the Clinton’s e-mails to be a duality prone one … for, while he stated the facts, and according to the facts there was not an inch, or a drop, of wrong doing that he could find and throw her to the pyre or the lion’s den, he did indeed do so, fist by implying from the phantasmagorical depth of his imaginative mind that the e-mails could have been hacked by the enemy and a couple other outlandish possibilities arising out of his creative mind.
    Secondly by replying to Chairman Jason Chaffetz’ question: :did Hillary Clinton lie?” with another question. “to the FBI?” and the statement, “I wasn’t part of the interrogation. I would have to review the documents.” and when Chaffetz asked “To the public?” Comey stated “I don’t know…” or, if I am misquoting him on the answer to the public lying he did say something quite similar to what I have quoted him here as saying.
    The schizophrenic divide between Comey’s finding and his subsequent suppositions, or “I don’t know” answers are a clear indication to the Republicans and those who hate Hillary that he was, notwithstanding the FBI’s findings on the issue, throwing her to the pyre or to the lion’s den. An indication or code message that the Republicans clearly took and which prompted Jason Chaffetz to begin yet another inquiry into the Hillary Clinton -mails.
    Never mind that, as Jon Perr in article Repulicans show how it is done,” states: “… as the Party of Trump gets the band back together to smear Hillary Clinton, it’s worth recalling just how effective this same cast of characters was on defense. After all, while suffering only a few prominent casualties like convicted felon Scooter Libby, the administration of Republican George W. Bush managed to survive eight years of almost nonstop scandals. From its historic failure on 9/11, the manipulation of Iraq intelligence, the prosecutors purge, and its 22 million missing emails to the Abramoff affair, Plamegate, illicit NSA domestic surveillance, and so much more, Team Bush weathered it all.”
    Never mind either that Comey had been one of the prosecutors appointed to the “Whitewater Clinton witch hunt” of so many years ago.
    James Comey’s integrity? In my mind it is not there. It seems to me that his integrity is a very polluted one perhaps carrying some covert remnants of Whitewater mud against Clinton.

  2. I agree with the comment. Comey should not even have given the press conference. It was against the standard procedure, which is that the FBI is under the direction of Justice and sends its reports to Justice where they are incorporated into the Justice report. in his arrogance, he didn’t even notify his boss that he was going public. Secondly, FBI reports should not have opinion, only facts–he gave his opinions. Thirdly nobody anywhere mentioned that Hillary had asked the state dept for a secure e-mail setup and didn’t get it, so she had to set up her own. The computer service in State was rudimentary and just getting set up, so there was general disorganization. Her generation (and mine) is not noted for our computer technical expertise–she undoubtedly gave the problem to a specialist and then trusted what he did. Fourth, nobody seems to consider that all of those around her did the same thing and worse. Bush alone deleted millions of e-mails. The media, who are biased against Hillary, do no research and cite no relevant facts. Hillary had to suffer the same hostile treatment on the Benghazi affair. Nobody ever seems to have heard that that type of incident happens in EVERY administration. That there was only one in her time at State is remarkable. Bush had about 10, with over 60 deaths. Why does noone ever mention this? She also suffered huge budget cuts and when she warned that security was not good and asked for funding to beef it up, she was denied twice. and then her republican enemies have the gall to blame her! Some of that committee have even admitted that the sole reason for so many investigations was to damage her image. Why don’t we try a little fairness to her for a change and quit slinging mud at her? And how do her alleged failures stand up to Trump’s? He has a nerve calling anyone Crooked! Let’s apply the same standards to him for awhile!