Correctly defining modern Zionism

Part One

There is much that the civilized world does not understand about modern Zionism. Today, the definitions of being Jewish, Israeli or Zionist are, to most people, analogous. They are not.

Indoctrinated into submitting to this incorrect, singular and collective definition, solely due to Zionism’s false claim of a direct religious link to Judaism, hence the objective, critical world cowers at the similarly incorrect, but inevitable charge of “anti-Semitism.” This false charge has too often caused the political and journalistic demise of too many. Thus the world is scared away from exercising one’s full mental faculties, such faculties of conscience that would normally rise-up in collective reaction and outrage.

The result, instead, has been worldwide apathy. This inaction towards the daily Zionist violations of the fundamental laws of the conscience of man has become the designed result. In the battle against the expansion of the many forms of worldwide Zionism, take note . . . we are losing!

For the outraged world to confidently and factually respond against the broad brush of the charge of anti-Semitism, one used continually and routinely to mask all discussion of Israeli and Zionist crimes, it is essential to understand what today defines “modern” Zionism, for here our fight for conscience begins. In reality, Zionism is an a-religious scourge that uses a singular excuse to justify its existence and its collective actions, an excuse—a hypocrisy—routinely missing in factual discussion and rarely understood by world Jewry as well. Here is what can be accurately described as the root of Zionist thought.

This fundamental is a prayer. It has been debated, reviled, cast out and reborn in repeated cycles by the most senior Jewish theologians over the past two thousand years. Most of the growing horrors of our world—past and present—can be summed up and exemplified within this single prayer, Jewish in creation, yet today exclusively Zionist in its modern use. Yes, one single self-serving, rarely mentioned, prayer that, when considered correctly is today the metaphor, if not the personification and the excuse, for all the moral ills that allow for the suffering across the world today. This metaphoric prayer transcends all religions. It is the propagation of a malignancy—now seemingly endemic—within a growing portion of humankind. Much worse, this fundamental provides for the willful individual rotting of one’s mind, one’s conscience, and . . . one’s soul.

This unconscionable prayer’s name? The Kol Nidrei.

Of Zionism past: Saying a prayer for Zionism

Zionism is not a recent ideology. The name is. In the 1890s, Theodor Herzl infused Zionism—the quest for a nation of Israel—with an expanded ideology that lead to the First Zionist Congress at Basel in 1897, which created the World Zionist Organization (WZO). Long ago cast-out from Judea since AD 70, by Roman Emperor Titus, and in seeming finality by Hadrian—who renamed the whole region Syria Palestinia in 135 AD—due to the Zionist Jew’s growing dominance of that small piece of the Roman Empire. Sadly, this happened repeatedly throughout history on multiple occasions by multiple other countries, and for centuries Judaism was repeatedly without a host country.

Unfortunately for the whole of world Jewry, at many points throughout history, like in Judea, their quest for a country was attempted via the ascension of powerful Jewish interests progressively gaining control over established nations and afflicting societal crimes that violated the conscience of the leaders of their host nations. As an example, in 1604 AD Catholic Pope Clement VIII proclaimed, “All the world suffers from the user of the Jews, their monopoly and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty . . . especially working people and the very poor.”

Here, Clement VIII—like many world leaders past and present—was inaccurate in his statement, for he, too, did not understand Zionism nor have a separate definition for it, and so made the oft-repeated mistake of associating all Jews together and, therefore, collectively demonizing the entire religion and all its followers instead.

Then, as is the case today with modern Zionism, the vast majority of world Jewry had committed no crime and deserved no charge, yet due to the actions of the few Jews who wilfully worked towards hegemonic sedition from within their host country of the time, Clement VIII cast-out all Jews in reaction. What Clement VIII failed to understand was that there was indeed a difference within this one religion to be noted: a difference that was not Judaism; it was—even back then—Zionism which excused its advocacy of the societal hypocrisy by citing within the minds of certain Jews, the Kol Nidrei.

By extension, the unjustifiable horrors of the Holocaust inflicted on Jews were a similar collective demonization by the German Third Reich of all Jews as their reaction to the practices of the very few; those who had violated the boundaries of the societal conscience of Germany and their own Torah.

However, the Germans who committed the resultant atrocities based solely on one’s affiliation with Judaism were unknowingly guilty of exactly the same failure of personal conscience that ignored the fundamental tenets of their own religious Catholicism and their bible. Together, these two subsets of religion within one society had one inherent amoral similarity: a failure of personal conscience, one that deliberately ignored or excused away their own religion’s prohibition against their barbaric crimes against the norms of society.

Known or not by name, theirs was each an individual use of an unjustifiable rationale; one that allowed their afflicted minds to strangely turn Evil into Good, Devil into God, and Wrong into Right. Today, this lapse of conscience is no longer peculiar to any one religion, but, when considered correctly, is indeed purely Zionist. To understand worldwide Zionism is to correctly understand the Kol Nidrei.

“All [personal] vows we are likely to make, all [personal] oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our [personal] vows, pledges and oaths are considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”—the Kol Nidrei.

The Kol Nidrei (“All Vows”) often misspelt Kol Nidre, was not originally a prayer, but a declaration offered during Rosh Hashana, the start of the Jewish new year. In “modern” Judaism it is now being delivered as a prayer and has so grown in prominence during the last sixty years that it is now delivered at the commencement of Judaism’s holiest yearly event of Passover.

The internal philosophical Judaic controversy over whether the Kol Nidrei should be allowed to be included in Jewish services has been argued, pro-or-con, for centuries by the most pre-eminent Judaic scholars, most of whom vehemently opposed its inclusion and banned it repeatedly. Their fundamental concern: How can the Jewish religion flourish if it violates the most fundamental tenet of human conscience?: Adherence to Right vs. the temptation of Wrong.

This question was succinctly answered over the centuries as the Kol Nidrei rightly fell from grace or was subsequently reinstated by new Zionist elements of society. Historical examination of the Kol Nidrei shows the polarity between the demand for the proper benevolence offered in the original Judaism of the Torah verses the post-Torah books of the Talmud, which contain rationales supported in part by this one single all-excusing prayer that is the fundamental malady, if not the definition, of modern Zionism.

As noted by Pope Benedict XIII in 1450, the deviance within Judaism was a result of the books of the Talmud.“The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their [Jews] knowing the truth.” This was also firmly noted by Michael Rodkinson, in the preface of the Babylonian Talmud, page XI, who commented, “The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud.”

The Kol Nidrei is almost as old as Judaism itself since its original text was in the ancient Aramaic language from before the time of Christ. Much of modern Jewry has falsely claimed that it was created in modern times as a reaction to their 20th-century persecution, but this is not true since fervent discussions about the divisive use of the Kol Nidrei were in controversy for many centuries prior. As long ago as the times of medieval Babylonian Jewry, five Geonim, the senior rabbinic leaders, were against its use while only one was in favour. Early Judaic scholar Saadia Gaon also wished to restrict the Kol Nidrei and declared that it gave no absolution from oaths an individual took during the year. Continuing this argument against the Kol Nidrei, Rabbi Yehudai Gaon of Sura (760 AD), forbade the study of the Nedarim, the Talmudic treatise on oaths which included the Kol Nidrei.

Of course, the most famous theologian of all time also cast-out the Kol Nidrei’s growing endemic bastardization and influence of religious conscience. Correctly assessing the fundamental source as the parasitic coven within Judaism—known then as the Pharisees—theirs were crimes against society and religion. Said he, “Ye [the Pharisees] are of your father the devil . . . and abode, not in the truth because there is not truth in him.”

That man, in providing this historically accurate and prescient sage advice, knew well of the societal evil to which he spoke (John VIII:44), for he too, was Jewish. His words were his personal reaction to this aberration within his own society during his own time, two thousand years ago.

His name: Jesus Christ.

The Pharisees were as consistent then as we see today with modern Zionism in quashing dissent and unleashing their retribution against any voice of honest, factual and truthful opposition against their growing power and propagation of societal crimes. They, then, used a hired third-party political mercenary, Judas Iscariot, to spout their scripted lies in order to have Jesus accused of the capital crime of sedition. When the Romans found no fault in Jesus’ actions, the Pharisees used behind-the-scenes pressure to coerce Pontius Pilate, the Roman Prefect of the region, into ignoring truth, facts and his own conscience. Setting a future example for all others who would consider following any other leadership against the surreptitious power of the Pharisees, Jesus was thus put to death in the most public political execution of all time. His true crime was in offering an alternative religious option based on love, peace and justice; one that was then an unwelcome but accurate reflection of the Pharisees and their a-religious offering of merely greed, poverty and war.

Does this sound familiar, today?

The Torah itself, which all Jews acknowledge as the bible of Judaism, clearly states, “You must fulfil what has crossed your lips and perform what you have voluntarily vowed to the LORD your God, having made the promise with your own mouth.” (Deuteronomy 23:22–24), but this was ignored by the Pharisees of that time, and also ongoing Judaic scholars, who began their adulteration of the Torah within their many subsequent self-serving philosophical volumes of the Talmud.

So a promise to God was sacrosanct. But, what of an oath to one’s fellow man? Or to one’s own conscience?

Rabbi Yechiel of Paris explained in a Disputation that took place before the King and Queen of France in 1240, “Only the erroneously broken vows are annulled, that nobody might commit the sin of intentionally breaking vows.”

Further, former Chief Rabbi of the British Empire Joseph Hertz wrote, “A vow or oath that was made to another person, even be that person a child or a heathen, could not be annulled except in the presence of that person and with his consent; while an oath which a man had taken in a court of justice could not be absolved by any other authority in the world.”

However, many nations’ legislators still considered it necessary to have a special form of oath administered to Jews (“Oath More Judaico”), and many judges also required a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on the Kol Nidrei prayer. The Russian government, in 1857, decreed that Jewish prayer books must include, as an introduction to the Kol Nidrei, a Hebrew explanation to readers of the limited nature of the vows that could be released by this ceremony.

This ancient argument of Right vs. Wrong seemed to be forever settled when, in 1844, the rabbinical conference held at Brunswick, Germany, decided unanimously that the rabbis in attendance from all over the world should exert their influence worldwide to completely and forever abolish the Kol Nidrei.

Had this prohibition—one that correctly served the interests of religious Judaism—remained in effect, world Jewry and Israel would likely live in peace with their fellow man today.

However, beginning in 1961, true Judaism was again hypothecated by a new set of false religious pariahs who brought back the Kol Nidrei—while using the Talmud as justification—into prominence and modern usage. This renewed indoctrination of the Zionist mind became complete when this cunning prayer was thus mandated to be said at the beginning of each year’s Passover.

Thus viewed correctly, Zionism is not a religion, nor is it part of Judaism. It is a political tool of expediency and far more comparable to the Western created Daesh/ ISIS. Both use a self-serving created form of an ostensibly beneficent religion, Muslim or Judaic, as an alternate rendition of that religion that excuses away a person’s obvious factual sins against one’s true religious dogma and one’s own conscience.

In the ages-old religious argument of whether mankind is born good or evil, as is shown in the daily newsreels of the continued and growing horrors against true humanity, Zionism, like Saudi Wahhabism, has made an a-religious and hypocritical choice to honour the later.

Zionism first defined: A conquest of country

“In violent opposition to all this sphere of [positive], Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. Most, if not all, of them, have forsaken the faith of their forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new.”—Winston Churchill

When the Israeli Zionists, in 1948, achieved their goal of attaining the nation of Israel, theirs was a victory that had already shown, over the previous thirty years, their methods and goals of new world hegemony to come.

The Zionist inspired Balfour agreement was not, as claimed, merely the guarantee of carving Israel out of existing Palestine, it was a bribe.

On Nov. 7, 1917, Lord Lionel Walter Rothchild, arguably the leading Zionist financial and political asset in Britain and America, due to his families multi-national banking interests, guaranteed UK foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour and the British Government—then losing WW I desperately—that he would bring American military might to their side in exchange for its ceding Palestine. This led to the signing of the Balfour Agreement, the entry of American troops under false premises and the agreed upon genocide and enforced relocation of the Palestinians.

Said Balfour publicly, “His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. . . . it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine . . .” [Emph. Added]

But, here, Balfour lied, having himself succumbed to Zionist influence within his own failure of conscience and personal religious hypocrisy. This was clearly shown when he privately, and far more truthfully, stated, “For in Palestine, we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting with wishes of the [Palestinians]. And Zionism . . . (is) of far profounder [sic] import than the desire and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who inhabit this ancient land.”

This pro-Zionist and fully exclusionary mindset is continued in the horrors perpetrated against Palestinians and other nations to this day. Consider the past three months of this current year alone. Over 150 Palestinians have been slaughtered on their own land and almost 5,000 wounded because of related IDF approved genocidal target practice. Meanwhile, at the same time, nearly 4,500 new illegal settlements have also been recently approved on the occupied West Bank. Soon, reportedly, the US will approve the Israeli seizure of the entire Golan Heights. For within Zionism’s mental adherence to the Kol Nidrei is a further incorrect Talmudic influenced hegemonic adage which is used repeatedly as Israeli foreign policy, “Possession is 9/10ths of the law.”

Today, Palestine is a sliver of its 1917 boundaries. Over ninety-five percent has been purchased, coerced, annexed, destroyed or stolen by Israeli Zionists. Not satisfied yet, the deplorable conditions imposed by Israel on the remaining Palestinians are deliberate attempts at further genocide designed to finish their two thousand year project in their favour.

Expanding Zionism: From Palestine to America

“America is a Golden Calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left . . . Why? . . . This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.”—Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu (Credit to the Defense Intelligence Agency of the United States Department of Defense)

Israel and its Zionist minions control America. Completely. American nationalism and populism have been steadily changed since the establishment of Israel to an agenda today of “Israel First” and “Corporations First.” This is true for any aspiring US politician as well as in the mind of the average American voter. Worse, this current national endemic result is not limited only to America.

In the post-Palestine era after 1947, Zionists were not content with finally having their own nation of Israel. Their new nation would not have resulted without the pressure exerted on the United Nation’s members by the American government which ultimately produced, on Nov 27, 1947, UN resolution 181. As with the many previous host nations over the previous centuries that provided sanctuary to the Jewish faith, the Zionist sub-set within American politics began to further their power beyond the Israeli borders. Hence, Israel began the strengthening of its political control of the US Congress and its individual politicians. This, of course, is seen by the unapologetic decisions, platform and control exerted by AIPAC (the American Israeli Political Affairs Committee) which is undeniably the foremost political action interest within the US Congress. This is documented thoroughly in the 2006 academic work, “The Israel Lobby,” by University of Chicago and Harvard University professors John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt. Despite this carefully researched, referenced and footnoted study, and the fact that Mearsheimer is a Jew, both were publicly excoriated as being anti-Semites.

It is well established that both houses of the US Congress care not for the concerns of their voters once they have been placated every two or six years in order to be re-elected and return to primarily pleasing Zionist interests. Looking at US foreign policy alone, today the questionable moniker of “Dual Loyalty” is used to justify growing Israeli involvement in US military leadership and access by Israeli Zionists within the US government. In foreign policy, America’s military always marches to a Zionist tune that has little or no bearing on US national security, yet its politicians always avoid answering the question: “why?”

As shown repeatedly, from the 2015 Gaza war atrocities onto the granting of Jerusalem as the US denoted Israeli capital, followed by the anticipated subsequent slaughter of the few remaining indigenous Palestinians, if America is not invading on behalf of Israel or its Zionist brethren, such as Saudi Arabia destroying Yemen, it is re-supplying Zionist vassals with weapons or voting only for Zionist interests against UN resolutions and worldwide calls for of peace and sanity. Are not “Neoconservatism” and “American Exceptionalism” really the results of the inherent self-serving message of the Kol Nidrei applied to US nationalism and re-branded as national security—not as Zionism—for the dulled American mind?

Consider the fate of former US Secretary of Defence Chuck Hagel who, long ago during Obama’s presidency had the audacity, just prior to leaving for Tel Aviv, to say that he was first and foremost an American and would put American interests before that of Israel, adding, “”The political reality is that . . . the Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people up here.” Hagel later apologised for the use of the term “Jewish lobby,” saying he should have said “pro-Israel lobby,” but Hagel did not back down over his comments. He also continued to question the duplicity in US foreign and military policy that did not directly support American interests first. Being a former US senator (1997-2008) from Nebraska, Hagel was sincere in his pro-American statements, so sincere in fact that he was hypocritically cast out by Obama, who had, during his 2008 campaign, similarly opposed the “unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel.” Once Hagel returned to the exceptional nation from Tel Aviv he was, due to his president being now under Zionist control, summarily fired.

Military control, however, is only one of the many facets of Zionist control within American society and is certainly not necessarily Jewish. Here we see what the true goal of Zionism is within American society and that it does indeed clearly intend to, “suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left . . .”

From health care to education, social services to corporatization, life expectancy to retirement, America is in decline and Americans are in denial, too scared at being charged with anti-Semitism to take note of the obvious facts. Zionism is destroying their country, piece by piece, but they, unlike Hagel, Thomas, Mearsheimer and Walt, have been indoctrinated that any criticism will be denoted as anti-Semitic and/or disloyal to America. This only accelerates the decline while emboldening the sociopaths who do run their country without any concern for public well-being.

As shown in in a 2015 study by Professors Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University, those who run American government almost completely ignore providing any benefits that might help their voters.

Gilens and Page tabulated more than 20 years of congressional voting data to answer the question: Does the US government represent the people? They drew several conclusions, particularly that, “The opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America has essentially no impact at all . . . because purchasing political influence is 100% legal.” Those benefiting from congressional votes in the House and the Senate were almost exclusively the interests of corporate dominance, profit and greed, not the growing needs of the citizens. This is, and always has been throughout history, a peculiar trait of Zionism, since it features a type of greed so severe that it transcends human conscience and any obligation to society. In doing so, this abrogation of duty by politicians is very much in keeping with the tenets and political hypocrisy espoused by the Kol Nidrei.

Only in America are corporations legally treated as live human beings, but these newly created humans, as expected, have no conscience at all. The Zionist mind of the corporation has shown that it controls Congress as well as the US Supreme Court. Further, in the mind of the Zionist, all social services including education need to be privatized and its finances under their control, if not completely eliminated.

When the US Supreme Court made the case of Citizen’s United v F.E.C. the law of the land, few took the time to understand the real insidious nature of this historic and divisive Supreme Court decision.

Thirty-five year Supreme Court Justice, John Paul Stevens, did.

In a twenty-three page Dissenting Opinion and using strong words very rarely written within the collegial confines of the court, Stevens railed against Citizen’s United . . . and its likely results. As Stevens pointed out, the politically and corporately controlled court under brand new Chief Justice, John Roberts, violated the time-honoured legal concept of Stare Decisis. This was an extremely unusual move that saw the court take up for its subsequent divisive decision a standing appellate court decision, without a request by either of the two moving parties. Stevens also argued that the Court addressed a question not raised by the litigants, and that the majority changed the case to give themselves an opportunity to change the law.”

Further, incoming Chief Justice John Roberts, who ordered the case brought before the court anyway, threw the majority of his own written legal precedents on corporations in the rubbish bin of time in order to strangely join the majority opinion. Those are only a few of the problems with the creation of Citizen’s United, but here, again, Roberts and the 5-4 majority (Roberts, Kennedy, Alito, Thomas, Scalia) found a way to mentally and morally approve what was their own understood violation of law, if not a violation of conscience. Of course, this was in keeping with the mental hypocrisy of the Kol Nidrei. No, they did not likely know it by name, but those in the majority knew that they were indeed sacrificing their legal acumen, the US constitution and their moral obligation to the higher a authority of modern Zionism.

This cadre of Zionist thought within the Supreme Court is fully admitted by these modern day Pharisees of American jurisprudence who willingly brandish their personal attachment to the Federalist Society (FS). Current card carrying members members include Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. This organization supports rolling back civil liberties, imperial wars, free-wheeling laissez-faire capitalism and corporatism, along with ending New Deal/Great Society social programs. It’s also against reproductive choice, government regulations, labour rights, environmental protections, and justice for unwanted aliens.

This accusation that Federalist doctrine is controlling and creating the laws of the land was further confirmed this past week as this Supreme Court certified bigotry against one religion (Muslim) by allowing Trump’s pro-Israel travel ban. On the same day, the same court gutted what little remains of the American unions and the political influence of working voters via collective bargaining. As shown by the Page and Gilens study, unions are also anathema to corporate interests and this week national unions joined the Muslim world in being prohibited from helping social change against Zionist influence.

This was a big win for Zionism which abhors the nations of the Muslim world that it cannot control and was clearly shown in the list of countries that were banned. The countries which do not support American expansionism nor Zionism were all banned, while one of the most barbaric Muslim nations, Saudi Arabia, was exempt because their country’s leadership has been willing to suck on America’s and Israel’s teat.

US healthcare, despite being the most expensive per capita in the world, is measured, not by success in prevention, but by the nation’s operating table mortality rates, infant mortality rates and rising insurance rates, all of which are some of the worst in the developed world. Despite these foibles of American capitalist Zionism, HMO profits are also at historically high levels as are its administrative fees which exceed 20% compared to just over 2% in the UK’s vaunted NHS.

Pharmaceutical companies wine and dine doctors and politicians with a manipulative budget of over $1.2 billion per year. As a result, no longer is the FDA the ultimate arbiter of new drugs being brought to market since it allows and accepts verbatim the self-serving clinical trials of the drug companies that create these drugs. Many, as shown clearly on US television advertising, have a laundry list of side effects. Despite this, these drugs are approved and the doctors, with few exceptions, happily prostitute their Hypocratic Oath and scientific fact in order to serve up these tainted drugs to their unsuspecting and trusting patients.

These and many other prescription drugs, despite being offered in many other countries, are always the most expensive in America. When many Americans realized that Canada and Mexico offered the same drugs at a far lesser price, they took their prescriptions over the border to save money. However, once Big Pharma realized it no longer had a captured market, it used its powerful and paid for lobby in Congress to effect legislation making it a felony criminal offence similar to smuggling for anyone to save money on their prescriptions by traveling. Not a peep was heard from doctors nationally, nor from Congress who had, of course, also sold their professional souls already. This week, the Financial Times reported that Pfizer, the largest drug company in the US, has now further raised prices on 100 products. These price hikes were announced just weeks after President Trump claimed that US drug companies would soon announce “massive” voluntary price cuts.

As a reaction, certain municipalities and healthcare clinics have used cooperative buying to lower prices to their patients, but dutifully the FDA is already attempting to make this practice illegal as well.

Yearly, American education teaches Americans to be ignorant and not to think, much less develop an informed, fact-based opinion. Less and less federal funding goes to public education and the poor test scores show America in 38th position of developed nations worldwide in mathematics and 17th overall. This poor performance has led to the advent of private charter schools.

As championed by US Education Secretary Betsy De Voss, who is decidedly Zionist within her stated public comments about fixing public education, already world geography and critical thinking are rarely taught and history is so heavily skewed as to be revisionist. This is shown by too many Americans still believing that modern day Russia and the long dismembered Soviet Union remain unchanged and an identical threat as well as their failure to be able to find their own nation on a globe. This myopic narrow-mindedness has left most Americans with no interest in discerning the truth about the remaining world around them, but an illogical enthusiasm for US expansionism and “thermonuclear war.”

Americans are not stupid, but they are indeed extraordinarily ignorant. An ignorant populace increasingly has no desire for divining the truth of world events and so routinely turns to their singular news source for the “facts” that they hold as indisputable. To this end, in America most journalists prostitute their necessary role as the vanguards of society. This is easily evidenced by the fact that over 90% of all traditional media sources (TV, Radio, Newspaper) are owned and managed by just six huge corporate interests that have an all too similar editorial slant that favours a Zionist agenda. 20th-century American writer, Truman Capote, in a 1968 Playboy interview, assailed “the Zionist mafia” of his time that has since only increased its monopolizing of the news publishing industry today.

Reaffirming the current condition of journalism, this past week during a public speech in support of Julian Assange, award-winning, career journalist and documentary film maker, John Pilger commented on today’s Zionist media editorial control, saying, “Never has there been a collusion like the one between the U.S. and Israel. It suggests another word and that is “immunity.” It has a moral immunity, a cultural immunity, a geopolitical immunity, a legal immunity, and certainly a media immunity. All the talk of Iran and nuclear weapons is without any reference to the biggest nuclear power in the Middle East. [Israel]”

Indeed. With critical thinking substantially suppressed in America, and the media proffering virtually no criticism of Israel, nor Zionist crimes against society, the supposed journalists of the 4th Estate and First Amendment are mostly willing propagandists.

Or else.

Scared into submission while offering only a one sided Zionist agenda, and bribed with lucrative contracts and benefits, no US mainstream journalist will risk the likely connected charge of anti-Semitism. Virtually none will stand-up, respect their conscience and do a proper job of reporting on journalism’s control, and societal connection to, Zionism. In the minds of many, however, remains the sudden and tragic demise of the most senior White House correspondent in press history, Helen Thomas. Her crime: Stating what every member of the press already knew to be true, but did not have the guts to say themselves.

While chatting privately during a Washington, DC, cocktail party, Thomas said that Israel should, “ . . . get the hell out of Palestine. Remember, these people are occupied and it’s their land . . .” Then, as today, this sent of howls of outrage that she or anyone would audaciously state the truth, even in private. Hence, Thomas, her fifty-seven years as a White House correspondent and her exemplary dedication to a high standard of news reporting were gone from public view within 48 hours, when Hearst publications dutifully fired her in order to placate the Zionist outrage against the truth of this matter. She was, of course, speaking about Zionists, not Jews, yet she was charged with anti-Semitism, a capital crime, and summarily convicted.

Not one US journalist publicly came to Helen Thomas’ defence . . . which further illustrated how endemic this doctrine of linking criticism of Israel to anti-Semitism has become.

Helen Thomas, like the facts, truth and example of courage she represented, died less than two years later.

Did her example die with her?

(Author’s Note: This concludes Part One of this Two Part exposes on “Correctly Defining Modern Zionism.” Please return Monday to view the second and final chapter of this developing story of worldwide importance. B.R-T.)

Brett Redmayne-Titley has published over 150 in-depth articles over the past seven years for news agencies worldwide. Many have been translated. On-scene reporting from important current events has been an emphasis that has led to multi-part exposes on such topics as the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, NATO summit, KXL Pipeline, Porter Ranch Methane blow-out and many more. He can be reached at: live-on-scene((at)) Prior articles can be viewed at his archive:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Comments are closed.