The revelation is that Danny Jowenko is dead, the world’s leading building demolition expert was killed in a one-car accident last month, when his car slammed into a tree.
Jowenko was the man who received world attention as the expert who without hedging described how the collapse of Building 7 at the World Trade Center on 9/11 was an “internal demolition.” Congratulations to Ron Paul for his courage to put this short but earthshaking article on his website, the Daily Paul, for the world to see.
Jowenko amazingly made the “internal demo” judgment before he even knew he was looking at WTC7 on his video. He simply commented, “This is a controlled demolition, which was carried out by a team of experts.” CLICK THE VIDEO: Demolition expert Danny Jawenko watching Building 7 video for first time, “it was controlled demolition.” The clip was produced by Robert Bowman.
Jowenko unwittingly got even more spotlight time when, just three days later, the former director of the US Army War College, Dr. Alan Sabronsky, said in a radio interview in 2010, that his skepticism of the official 9/11 flow of events was prompted by Jowenko’s testimony. Jowenko’s death comes only three days after Sabrosky spoke in an exclusive interview with Press TV that his belief, which he said is common knowledge in some intelligence circles, is that cadres within both the CIA and Israeli Mossad planned 9/11. Dr. Sabrosky retains the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research at the US Army War College.
He believes that the attacks were planned and carried out to achieve “dovetailing” foreign policy goals. The first and foremost would be invading and Balkanizing Iraq.
Sabrosky says this has been long-time goal among neoconservatives associated with the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) think tank.
Dr. Sabrosky’s teaching plus research appointments include the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He is a Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, which amount to just about perfect credentials for evaluating Jowenko’s observations.
Really, there are only two intelligence agencies with the expertise, assets, access and political cover to execute 9/11 both in the air and on the ground: that is, our CIA and Israel’s Mossad.
Sabrosky tells of hearing Jowenko’s analysis at the moment in which he first suspected that what he had been hearing on the intelligence grapevine “was true.”
He noted that in 1996 an important policy paper written for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for securing the Realm,” appeared, advocating the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. It read, “Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”
The authors of this paper later became major members of George Bush’s foreign policy team, most of whom were members of the Project for a New American Century. They were Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. Perle was Chairman of Bush Defense Policy Advisory Committee until 2004. Douglas Feith was Bush’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Their wish for a Pearl Harbor-like attack on American soil could be just like the inciting incident to justify the American entrance into World War II, PNAC said in “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” It goes on, “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor”—Project for a New American Century, Sept. 2000.”
Sabrosky says local American veterans’ posts hold out the best hope for spurring a new 9/11 investigation and prosecutions, commenting, “The real 800 pound gorilla in the US lobbying system is the veterans groups . . .”
Sabrosky says local veterans’ posts can drive the process by asking for investigations and prosecutions through their local television news media. He considers both the national leadership of veterans’ organizations and the national media too “bought out.” Harsh words from such a seasoned military man.
Yet, Jowenko’s death comes as the latest of what many 9/11 Truth advocates call an unlikely string of deaths of key 9/11 witnesses. The most famous of these is the former chief of New York City’s Emergency Management Response Team, Barry Jennings, who was the last official out of the Emergency Command Center in WTC 7 before its collapse. Jennings said on camera that he had heard explosions from within the building that he knew were not fuel tanks or boilers, as a former “boiler man.” He also described walking out of its bombed-out lobby on the morning of 9/11, describing the feeling as walking over bodies.
Earlier this year, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik said in a radio interview that he is prepared to tell a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag attack (inside job.) Pieczenik served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior.
Pieczenik commented in a radio interview, “It was called a stand-down and false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under the false pretense that we had been attacked by Al Qaeda and bin Laden which is an absolute unmitigated lie. I was even told by a general on the staff of Wolfowitz; I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who that name was so we can break this open . . .”
Paul Wolfowitz was one of the ringleaders in the Bush administration who openly expressed the need for “a new Pearl Harbor,” as a member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) as well. This information has been known for years among members of 9/11 Truth and independent writers, researchers, pilots, ex-military men, architects, engineers, and others. This revival of the information by Ron Paul is heroic, considering his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president, as of now slated for the flip-flopping Mitt Romney.
In this writer’s estimation Ron Paul has put his money where his mouth is in exposing this information, an extension of his fundamental policy to end all US wars. By exposing the false pretenses under which the War on Terror began only days after, he gives a whole new circle of American voters food for thought and reason to vote for him. I wish him luck for his bravery and safety for his passage. The people in charge of this larger scenario are prepared to write anything imaginable into the ongoing script.
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer, life-long resident of New York City. An EBook version of his book of poems “State Of Shock,” on 9/11 and its after effects is now available at Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com. He has also written hundreds of articles on politics and government as Associate Editor of Intrepid Report (formerly Online Journal). Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.
If the 9-11 false flag attack issue takes off in public opinion, it has the potential to shake the average citizen awake from his consensus trance and create a paradigm shift in American politics. The WTC 7 collapse is an self-evident smoking gun that is staring everyone in the face; it needs little elaboration and its implications are enormous.
As much as I relish the smoking gun of 911, I don’t expect it to jar the masses out of their inactivity. I suspect it will take another, inevitable $ crisis, this bigger than the last (each in recent years are deeper than the last) that will mobilize sufficient numbers for general strikes. 911 theories lay the groundwork for the disenchantment that informs action. The need is in my opinion for left wing action which is why Occupy is so important.