Will the November US presidential election bring the end of the world?

“We have been watching for nearly a month a steady buildup of American and NATO forces along Russia’s borders—on land, on sea and in the air. There has been nothing like this on Russia’s borders, such an amassing of hostile military force, since the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”

So concludes America’s leading Russian expert, Professor Stephen Cohen (Princeton and New York University).

Professor Cohen asks if Washington is sleepwalking and needs to wake up or whether Washington has gone crazy and intends war.

Pepe Escobar advises Washington to “beware what you wish for: Russia is ready for war.”

Escobar reports that recently the Rand Corporation, “essentially a CIA outpost,” concluded that “Russia could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less.” On the level of nukes and missile systems, Russia is four generations ahead of the US military/security complex, which is mainly interested in inflating profits with cost overruns. US weapons systems are simply outclassed.

Nevertheless, the Russian high command is concerned with the Russian government’s low-key response to Washington’s aggression. The generals blame the “Atlanticist Integrationists” who infect Putin’s government. This faction is believed to be organized around Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and believes Russia should make concessions to Washington in order to be accepted as part of the West. The incompetent Russian central bank and neoliberal economists are part of the faction whose goal is to be part of the West regardless of its impact on Russian independence from Washington’s Empire.

Stephen Cohen and Alastair Crooke, a former British secret agent, almost alone in the West have noticed that the Russian military and predominant part of the government that emphasizes national sovereignty are putting pressure on President Putin to eliminate those in the government who are willing to compromise Russia’s independence in order to gain acceptance by Washington.

This has been my own opinion for some time. It is impossible to adequately stand up to an external threat when unreliable elements are part of the threatened government.

If Putin is forced to remove Washington’s agents from his government, as he must do if Russia is to survive Washington’s plots, he must not let them leave Russia. If they escape, they will end up in Washington to be used as Washington’s Russian government in exile. If Putin doesn’t want to put them on trial for treason, then a form of national house arrest would be a solution.

Alastair Crooke writes that Washington is miscalculating by seeking unipolar hegemony and, thus, is forcing Putin into the camp of the nationalists who value Russia’s sovereignty more than Western acceptance. Washington’s use of NATO in an effort to corner Russia with military buildups on Russia’s land and sea borders is forcing compromise out of Russia’s response to Washington’s aggression.

Regardless of Escobar’s description of Russian military superiority over the West, Russian independence is between a rock and a hard place. The rock is the American neoconservatives’ determination to achieve hegemony over Russia. The hard place is those within the Russian government who are more Western than Russian in their orientation.

If Trump becomes US president, there is some possibility, perhaps, that the neoconservatives will cease to dominate US foreign and military policies. Should this turn out to be the case, the Russian nationalists might ease their pressure on Putin to remove the Atlanticist Integrationists from the government.

If Hillary becomes US president, the neoconservative threat to Russia will escalate. The Atlanticist Integrationists will be eliminated from the Russian government, and Russia will move to full war standing.

Remember what an unprepared Russia did to the German Wehrmacht, at that time the most powerful army ever assembled. Imagine what a prepared Russia would do to the crazed Hillary and the incompetent neoconservatives.

As I have previously written, pushing Russia to war means the demise of the US and Europe and, considering the destructive power of nuclear weapons, most likely of all life on earth.

The main cause of this danger is the arrogance, hubris, and utter stupidity of the American neoconservatives who are ensconced in positions of power and influence and in Hillary’s presidential campaign. A secondary cause is Europe’s vassal status, which deprives Europe of a sensible foreign policy and forces Europe to enable Washington’s aggression.

What this means is that no matter what you think of Trump, if you vote for Hillary you are definitely voting for the end of the world.

Copyright © 2016 Paul Craig Roberts

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost.

4 Responses to Will the November US presidential election bring the end of the world?

  1. Roberts’s article seems spot on to me. I taught in a management systems masters degree program on US Air Force NATO bases twelve months during 1982-83 at Incirlik, Turkey; Hellinikon, Greece; Soesterberg, Holland; Hessich, German; and Aviano, Italy. It was well known among my students, all ranks of Air Force personnel below general, that we Americans stationed there at that time were nothing more than hostages if the Russians decided to roll across their borders to the west and take whatever they might want to take, which was the main the western Europeans wanted us there, proof we would support them in a real war. I had a great time during my year in Europe and developed a great deal of respect for the efficiency and culture of the US air force. I wrote back to the coordinator of the TSU-E program in 1988 or so it was too bad the Russians had declared peace against us by tearing down the Berlin Wall, since it caused the TSU-E academic program to be curtailed. It appears the US does not really want peace now, or at least the political-industrial-intelligence complex does not, otherwise they would not be threatening and taunting the Russia as they have been, almost like playground bullies trying to start a fight. I think Roberts is right about the military strength of Russia today. I used to think the US government was the good guy doing the right thing to defend its citizens and the weak around the world, and would never aggravate a fight just for the hell of it.

  2. Russia and the other BRICS nations along with any other nation smart enough to join the coalition of the rational need to form a solid military bloc ready to fight western aggression.

  3. Pingback: News of Planet of the Apes with Meria | Meria.net

  4. I can feel the pain in every word that Dr. Roberts writes. I feel it bad and have felt it since Bill Clinton became our President and unfortunately made a Wh–e House of our sacred mansion. Madame President? I hate it when the President speaks and stands in front of The White House sign and blocks those two letters out. I do feel your pain, Dr. Roberts.