Warnings mount that Trump’s infrastructure plan will make it harder to fight pipelines

The president's proposal ‘could be a significant blow to the slew of protesters who spent years agitating against the Keystone XL pipeline and more recently the Dakota Access one.’

As green groups continue to denounce the Trump administration’s recently unveiled infrastructure plan as a “scam” that’s designed to keep the nation trapped in its “dirty and destructive past,” analysts are also warning the proposal will “make it harder for the next big anti-pipeline movement” to launch successful legal challenges to new fossil fuel projects.

The plan aims to not only fast-track the construction of more pipelines across the U.S., but also to limit “the legal options available to lawyers at environmental groups opposed to new fossil fuel infrastructure” in part by changing “the standard under which a pipeline project could be temporarily halted by a judge,” as Dino Gradoni explains in a Washington Post piece published Friday.

Trump also wants Congress to rewrite long-standing environmental laws that allow for lawsuits challenging permits. Gradoni notes that although the administration’s desire for that specific revision by lawmakers may be a bit of a “pipe dream,” enacting barriers to launching legal challenges against pipeline projects “could be a significant blow to the slew of protesters who spent years agitating against the Keystone XL pipeline and more recently the Dakota Access one.”

Additionally, as just the latest development in the Trump administration’s long-term pursuit of “American energy dominance” through the exploitation of “vast amounts” of energy reserves on public lands, the infrastructure plan proposes allowing Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke to approve the construction of pipelines through national parks. Currently, only acts of Congress can do that.

The environmental group 350.0rg has launched a campaign to pressure members of Congress to oppose Trump’s plan, which they describe as a “climate-wrecking pipeline bonanza.” In a drafted letter to senators, the group declares, “This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks.”

“And Trump wants to pay for this pipeline bonanza with deep cuts to essential programs like food assistance and Medicaid—a cruel attack on America’s most vulnerable communities—and by forcing taxpayers in cash-strapped cities and states to pick up most of the tab. That’s unacceptable,” the letter continues, calling on Congress to advocate for an infrastructure deal “that creates millions of jobs and helps build the 100 percent renewable energy-powered world we need.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Jessica Corbett is a Common Dreams staff writer.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

One Response to Warnings mount that Trump’s infrastructure plan will make it harder to fight pipelines

  1. Do you drive a car? Wear nylon clothes? Use household plastics? Eat food grown by others? All of these require petrochemicals to produce and to transport. It will be decades before the entire US car and truck fleet can be converted to electric power. Meanwhile, transporting oil to the refinery via pipeline is more efficient than tanker shipment, and generally less risky to the environment.